

Estate & Succession Planning
Estate & Succession Planning
Marriage is often considered a sacred institution in India, deeply rooted in tradition and societal values. Unlike in many other countries where prenuptial agreements (prenups) are legally binding contracts that outline financial and asset-related arrangements in the event of a separation, the Indian legal system does not formally recognize such agreements. However, with changing societal dynamics and increasing financial complexities, couples are exploring ways to secure their financial interests in a legally acceptable manner.
The Indian Contract Act, 1872, which governs contracts in India, declares that any agreement that contravenes public policy or is deemed immoral is void. Since Hindu marriages are traditionally regarded as sacraments rather than contracts, any pre-marital agreement contemplating separation is considered contrary to public policy and, therefore, unenforceable1.
Additionally, the Act specifies that agreements restraining legal proceedings are void. This means that a prenup that limits or waives a spouse’s right to seek legal recourse would not hold up in Indian courts.
That said, there have been instances where courts have considered prenups in specific contexts:
Indian courts largely determine the validity of prenuptial agreements on a case-by-case basis, primarily evaluating whether the agreement contradicts statutory rights and obligations. Indian marriage laws emphasize that marriages, particularly Hindu marriages, are considered sacraments rather than contracts, which further complicates the enforceability of prenups. Courts have ruled against prenups that:
In contrast, prenuptial agreements are enforceable in the United States if they meet procedural and legal requirements. Courts in the U.S. assess factors such as the duration of the marriage, the presence of children, and overall fairness of the agreement at the time of execution and enforcement.
However, if an American prenuptial agreement is presented in an Indian court, it would be evaluated under Indian law, particularly regarding its compatibility with public policy. Even if legally valid in the country of execution, it may not be enforceable in India.
Given the legal constraints surrounding prenups, couples can explore alternative financial arrangements that offer similar protections while complying with Indian laws. These alternatives not only help safeguard financial interests but also play a crucial role in estate planning for married couples, ensuring that assets are managed and transferred efficiently in case of separation or unforeseen circumstances.
While traditional prenuptial agreements are not legally enforceable in India, there are strategic alternatives that couples can consider to protect their financial interests. By leveraging legally recognized structures such as partnership firms and private trusts, couples can achieve similar financial security while adhering to Indian legal principles. As societal perspectives evolve, there may be future legislative developments around prenuptial agreements, but until then, proactive financial planning remains key to ensuring stability and clarity in marital arrangements.
[1] Tekait Man Mohini Jemadi v. Basanta Kumar Singh and Krishna Aiyar v. Balammal
[2] Pran Mohan Das v. Hari Mohan Das
[3] Sandhya Chatterjee v. Salil Chandra Chatterjee
Background: A successful entrepreneur brought Entrust on board after global private banks fell short of expectations in managing a complex overseas investment structure. Challenge: The client, a resident Indian, had established a foreign company for investments. Initially, we were engaged purely to manage the portfolio. However, it became evident early on that this was not […]
Background: This client inherited a significant corpus and approached Entrust for investment advisory services. We designed a risk-aligned, staggered portfolio rollout. Challenge: At the onset of COVID-19, the client experienced deep anxiety and considered liquidating his portfolio entirely in favor of fixed deposits. It was clear he needed more than investment advice—he needed consistent support […]
Background: The client, a prominent creative entrepreneur, approached Entrust with apprehension. At the time, 90% of her investment portfolio was managed by other wealth firms. Her engagement with us began with a healthy skepticism about our role and the value we could bring. Challenge: Our mandate spanned investments, bookkeeping, real estate, legal, and concierge services. […]
signup for updates